Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] KD tree "bug"?

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] KD tree "bug"?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "thetis guan" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] KD tree "bug"?
  • Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:57:59 +0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=P6a97k0H+FaKr7dPhguxtZBRX+nG74oHdnPV/3mf9i2mUHo3vo8fJx/ZPfn8rghmASO6/dfy1vCZ/9Le5AhRM3oXjIvgyalOEHQ1GJXd4phzc09SKa6yvauZfcPt5hCtW1ZcU+/Shfbytmto1AMORiqkLuD1WCgx3kuS2iWsbpw=

hi Yajun Wang
 
 do you use .Net2005?  if you do, please add some assert sentence!
 
in your solution,

In in "C/C++ | Preprocessor" Add

_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE

_SECURE_SCL=0

_HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING=0

to Preprocessor Definitions for both Debug and Release.

cheers,
thetis


 
On 4/29/07, Yajun Wang <> wrote:
Hi cgal developers:

I am using CGAL::Incremental_neighbor_search<Traits, GeneralDistance,
Splitter, SpatialTree> to do neighbor search. It turns out that if the
Tree's size is 0, cgal will produce segment fault (the latest
version). Is it possible to put an assertion check in the cgal code so
that it is more visible to the users?

thanks for the effort.

regards,
yalding
--
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page