CGAL users discussion list

["Yajun Wang" <>]

Hi thetis:

I am working on Linux platform with gcc 3.4.6. I just think cgal
should add some assertion in the KD-tree code (actually, there are a
lot of assertion codes in cgal, which helps a lot when my program
fails). However, producing segment faults is not informative in the
debugging, :(

regards,
yalding

On 4/30/07, thetis guan 
<>
 wrote:
> hi Yajun Wang
>
>  do you use .Net2005?  if you do, please add some assert sentence!
>
> in your solution,
>
>
>  In in "C/C++ | Preprocessor" Add
>
>  _CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE
>
>  _SECURE_SCL=0
>
>  _HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING=0
>
>  to Preprocessor Definitions for both Debug and Release.
> cheers,
> thetis
>
>
>
> On 4/29/07, Yajun Wang 
> <>
>  wrote:
> >
> > Hi cgal developers:
> >
> > I am using CGAL::Incremental_neighbor_search<Traits,
> GeneralDistance,
> > Splitter, SpatialTree> to do neighbor search. It turns out that if the
> > Tree's size is 0, cgal will produce segment fault (the latest
> > version). Is it possible to put an assertion check in the cgal code so
> > that it is more visible to the users?
> >
> > thanks for the effort.
> >
> > regards,
> > yalding
> > --
> > You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
> > To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
> > https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss
> >