Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: "Wesley Smith" <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] [Fwd: 3D Voronoi diagrams]
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 01:39:04 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uV8LDrrK4Fjv6CtjgIyi3UQGXTrg+wgWs0nDgFcGfcOlS6kcYEObKHfRJVmMifBrRl/Cn08PIGnj0AvxROB8Bdm1UVz6fhgzZTuBB3AG/KRMwaw85RJqHVzJnKoMeH/Gk0vO3j/U/kHmigQIvV+rUFetjilgDWYyJxRcfBStqjo=
> > Unfortunately, the dual of a
> > Delaunay vertex in 3D is not available as a function so you have to
> > write it yourself.
>
> We could probably provide a Polyhedron_3 as the result of the dual() of
> a Delaunay site. I am not sure it would be very useful.
Actually, this is the part of the voronoi structure I find most useful
and would absolutely love to have in CGAL. From a graphics and
generative design standpoint having a Polyhedron_3 dual would be a
huge benefit. The thing I've had the hardest time doing with CGAL is
getting the voronoi structure up to the point where it intersects with
the convex hull. Are there efficient ways to derive this from the
Delaunay_triangulation_3 class?
thanks
wes
- [Fwd: 3D Voronoi diagrams], Andreas Meyer, 11/08/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] [Fwd: 3D Voronoi diagrams], Wesley Smith, 11/08/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] [Fwd: 3D Voronoi diagrams], Monique . Teillaud, 11/09/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] [Fwd: 3D Voronoi diagrams], Wesley Smith, 11/09/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] [Fwd: 3D Voronoi diagrams], Monique . Teillaud, 11/09/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] [Fwd: 3D Voronoi diagrams], Wesley Smith, 11/09/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] [Fwd: 3D Voronoi diagrams], Monique . Teillaud, 11/09/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] [Fwd: 3D Voronoi diagrams], Wesley Smith, 11/08/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.