Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] Problem with Convex Hull, again

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] Problem with Convex Hull, again


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Rafael Roberto" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Problem with Convex Hull, again
  • Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:44:55 -0300
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=HvGFdPmfEW/ZhUtYCmKAcigw50622RKm6tPBeFc2DPKMloJO9S2bbVHcCPo4IIX/0K 4DHyjMS++p1QQJxmUum2lKw8VaDgM1jQ0AYxZ+7wNSFrafF2oYZwBopK2Ibit3tdSS1i u9rYP9btoG+gFaq/honCX5iBlHQR9MabCI84Q=

Hello everyone,

Ashwin, its works fine to me too when I change to Exact_predicates_exact_constructions, like you said. I have no idea what this problem could be, I'm starting using CGAL just now, so I still have much to learn to see those things.

And wasn't me that ran this code with g++ in Linux. Unfortunately we don't have Linux here, so I couldn't make this test, but Bernd (a list member) said to me that this worked fine with him in those conditions.

But now, I have a doubt: what is the real difference beteween Exact_predicates_exact_constructions to Exact_predicates_inexact_constructions?


Thank you all,
Rafael Roberto



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page