CGAL users discussion list

[Lauri Lehtovaara <>]

Lauri Lehtovaara wrote:
> Yes, I know. The only reason why I chose Delaunay_d was that it had 
> more flexible license (LGPL). I'm planning to publish my work under  
> some open source license when it's ready, but QPL is too strict for me.
This is confusing. The web page says that it should be LGPL but the 
source code says QPL. For example, see Delaunay_d.h in the 3.4 source vs.
http://www.cgal.org/Manual/3.4/doc_html/cgal_manual/packages.html#part_IV

So, Delaunay_d QPL as well?

- Lauri