Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Pierre Alliez <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Mesh Cutting
- Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:10:09 +0100
- Organization: INRIA
for parameterization it is better to have a compact disc (large area
for small perimeter), and when remeshing using local operators you just
need that the underlying patch is parameterized to reach good
performances.
size of the disk in terms of #triangles obviously matters for
performance issues
shape also matters in the sense that if the patch boundary is closed to
a circle you can map it to a circle in parameter space (eg fixed
boundary method) with little distortion.
Chaman Singh Verma a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Pierre
Alliez <>
wrote:
hi Chaman,
the disks required for the parameterization are...topological disks, ie
the input chain
of halfedges must bound a disk.
If I follow your next email about isotropic remeshing perhaps you are
trying to re-implement " Isotropic Remeshing of Surfaces: a Local
Parameterization Approach" ? unfortunately I have not put the
implementation in CGAL and (I do not have one to send you) you can
always check at any point in time during remeshing check that a patch
is a disk and in the negative, construct one by region growing while
enforcing this property.
pierre
Pierre Alliez
INRIA Sophia Antipolis - Mediterranee
Project-team GEOMETRICA
http://www-sop.inria.fr/members/Pierre.Alliez/
Tel: +33 4 92 38 76 77
Fax: +33 4 97 15 53 95
Chaman Singh Verma a écrit :
Hello,
In the CGAL Surface Parameterization modules, it is mentioned that it
mandatory to provide topological disks
and there are no automatic way to do it and it is still open problem.
Can someone give deeper inside the properties of the disks that are
required for parameterizations ?
Also, I was thinking that many mesh partitioning tools ( such as Metis
) can create lots of surface patches,
aren't those patches good for parameterization ? What is the opinion
of the community on this issue ?
Thanks.
Chaman Singh Verma
Poona, India.
Hello Pierre,
Thanks for your reply, but still I have some doubt. Doesn't metis
produces connected patches and what are the
issues because of which this approach in not mentioned in the
literature. Does the shape and size of the disk
matter for good parameterization ?
Thanks.
csv
|
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.