Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: panayiotis foteinos <>
- To:
- Subject: [cgal-discuss] Constructions vs Predicates
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:40:54 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=Q4CfjgU4dlxI8W/C6dmrG6xjvYHF16+45dcUmj61L9ATRCI55wcZIlBPAsFGJBQ+rC X+7sf7fJSsMd5LWEcsk7MkxE8jgTlZrMSdRZBvfrvkQA4GboscYjRfW9plKyGXmMGqUh ESEhIRmepz1I6ZpkVTcTCBA3kWGlKkmG/6GKA=
Hello all.
I am using the simple cartesian kernel with double precision and exact
predicates.
I observed that sometimes CGAL answers that the points p, q and
CGAL::midpoint(p, q) are not collinear. Is this the expected behavior?
Thank you in advance,
Panagiotis Foteinos
- [cgal-discuss] Constructions vs Predicates, panayiotis foteinos, 04/27/2009
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Constructions vs Predicates, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 04/28/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.