Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - [cgal-discuss] 3D Delaunay Triangulations

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

[cgal-discuss] 3D Delaunay Triangulations


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Panagiotis Foteinos <>
  • To:
  • Subject: [cgal-discuss] 3D Delaunay Triangulations
  • Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:12:16 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cJa07oiL28g+62wGal4L9+MbPBLyze2SNleFlPpRCtqouwgwM/EtcrCsQezqHEfW65 c8m+sVfovZtgqsojxlWtjAl5neHQJmZ5w5z3MCUnzVAxZlnYYgo1tIewVDMegjHYRmR6 p3Gtxz9cryxCJK/Zfe2OT5ue+WfZIRuwTYTQI=

Hello all.

I have few questions to ask:


1) When a new tetrahedron, say t, is created: Is a new Cell_handle
allocated to accommodate t, or Cell_handle might point to a previously
allocated (but not currently used for any tetrahedron accommodation)
memory? I am asking because it would be ideal for my purposes, if no new
tetrahedron takes info() values from an old one...

2) When a Vertex_handle, say v, is inserted: Does a Cell_handle,
accommodating a tetrahedron outside the cavity/hole of v, point to
another memory address after v's insertion? The answer should be
negative, just making sure...

2) When a Vertex_handle, say v, is deleted: Does a Cell_handle,
accommodating a tetrahedron outside the hole to be retriangulated, point
to another memory address after v's removal? The answer should be
negative, just making sure...

Hope I was clear enough.

Thank you,
Panagiotis



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page