Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Joao Dinis <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Convex_hull_3 peformance
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:42:26 +0000
Dear Monique,
thanks for your reply.
Reading the report you post about shed some light on the subject.
So it seams, building the 3D convex hull is not the CGAL way of
computing the Delaunay triangulation of points on (or near) the sphere,
but it is best to generalize the incremental algorithm of computing the
2D Delaunay triangulation.
I think it is fair to assume that one of the algorithms mentioned on the
report will find their way into the CGAL library, am I right?
Best regards,
-- Joao Dinis
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 16:13 +0100, Monique Teillaud wrote:
> Joao Dinis wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've found intriguing run times while computing 3D convex hulls of sites
> > on the surface of a sphere.
>
> Dear Joao,
>
> you may be interested by the following preprint, which reports on
> experiments for points on a sphere:
> http://hal.inria.fr/inria-00405478/
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> Monique Teillaud
> INRIA Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée
> http://www.inria.fr/sophia/members/Monique.Teillaud/
>
- [cgal-discuss] Convex_hull_3 peformance, Joao Dinis, 02/10/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Convex_hull_3 peformance, Monique Teillaud, 02/14/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Convex_hull_3 peformance, Joao Dinis, 02/15/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Convex_hull_3 peformance, Monique Teillaud, 02/15/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Convex_hull_3 peformance, Joao Dinis, 02/15/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Convex_hull_3 peformance, Monique Teillaud, 02/14/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.