Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: D Haley <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] cmake build speed
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 04:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DRcvTrXUCqcYKpaP92Pnvcku95ajaVg/pat+WUKUzKGxU0y2pQQJ6O6MeEslUfHBtehVXAR/6F/1Pa9JzXrghfaLnSgi7kySjbL4ECV0FzXudSagjUhTsNMkwf1KUBD8E/OjrZNSVCrWERX6T/fer67WIw1vuqhnsSS54AXFDN4=;
> Since cmake has proper dependency
> analysis and the
> generated makefiles only rebuild the source files that need
> to get
> rebuild, ccache won't help here, right?
This depends upon whether you make clean or not on your project. My personal
workflow seems to get about a 50% hit rate on the cache.
Alternates are to use precompiled headers or if you have slow disks /tmp with
a ram disk (dangerous)
- [cgal-discuss] cmake build speed, celil, 07/27/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] cmake build speed, D Haley, 07/27/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] cmake build speed, Joachim Reichel, 07/28/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] cmake build speed, D Haley, 07/28/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] cmake build speed, Joachim Reichel, 07/29/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] cmake build speed, D Haley, 07/28/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] cmake build speed, Joachim Reichel, 07/28/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] cmake build speed, Joachim Reichel, 07/28/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] cmake build speed, D Haley, 07/27/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.