Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] Half-edge representation, CGAL vs OpenMesh

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] Half-edge representation, CGAL vs OpenMesh


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Nicholas Mario Wardhana <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Half-edge representation, CGAL vs OpenMesh
  • Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:54:38 +0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=sBrbdzLiK07bI5kQfVXcWuLF2+/1oaOOOjt+TVkd27iu20MOwV+xavTOAHORHw9mpN wUiJQ0ZPCdanHPk8kmGYTUIwELTkrYD/AOqvoq3oxoDZCNWQdso6SJiJkJiweFR80911 savTPc9cjdLmpsu7f8PoyX8ZyvXn0Te+zzE3E=

On 13 January 2011 15:01, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)
<>
wrote:
> I am quite surprised by your answer. What are the limitation of the
> existing data structures?
>

Hi Sebastien,

What we abandon is the idea of using half-edge representation.
Previously we were about to implement a method to compute the
intersections of some polyhedra, which are represented by their
half-edges. However, after our recent internal discussion, it turned
out that our previous method was too complicated, so we are trying
different approach. So far face-vertex (FV) representation is enough
for this purpose, and we are not sure whether either CGAL or OpenMesh
directly supports it. For CGAL, we can't find a class like polygon in
3D space to represent the face, and I suppose the face classes in both
CGAL and OpenMesh (HalfedgeDS<Traits,Items,Alloc>::Face in CGAL and
OpenMesh::PolyMeshT<Kernel> in OpenMesh, although I am not really sure
about the latter) are quite closely related to half-edge structure
(please correct me if I am wrong), so currently we develop our simple
FV data structure.

My apology if I did not make myself clearly enough in the previous
e-mail, and thank you.

Best regards,
Nicholas Mario Wardhana



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page