Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: schrodingersnewcat <>
- To:
- Subject: [cgal-discuss] Re: Memory Management with Nef_polyhedra
- Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Okay, I've done some more investigating. I got valgrind to work on an
executable compiled using intel's c++ compiler (g++ compiled code kept
complaining about -froundingmath when I used valgrind, even though I used
the switch during compile as I should).
So what I found out was this: There appear to be no memory leaks, however
the allocated memory is huge. For 20000 identity transformations the
allocated memory was around 2.7 GB. Is there a reason that asking for level
3 optimization or other compiler switches might cause the memory to grow
like this?
Thanks for any help.
--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Memory-Management-with-Nef-polyhedra-tp3404480p3409822.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- [cgal-discuss] Memory Management with Nef_polyhedra, schrodingersnewcat, 03/25/2011
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Memory Management with Nef_polyhedra, schrodingersnewcat, 03/28/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Memory Management with Nef_polyhedra, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/28/2011
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Memory Management with Nef_polyhedra, schrodingersnewcat, 03/28/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Memory Management with Nef_polyhedra, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/28/2011
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Memory Management with Nef_polyhedra, schrodingersnewcat, 03/28/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Memory Management with Nef_polyhedra, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/28/2011
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Memory Management with Nef_polyhedra, schrodingersnewcat, 03/28/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Memory Management with Nef_polyhedra, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/28/2011
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Memory Management with Nef_polyhedra, schrodingersnewcat, 03/28/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.