CGAL users discussion list

[schrodingersnewcat <>]

Okay, I've done some more investigating.  I got valgrind to work on an
executable compiled using intel's c++ compiler (g++ compiled code kept
complaining about -froundingmath when I used valgrind, even though I used
the switch during compile as I should).  

So what I found out was this:  There appear to be no memory leaks, however
the allocated memory is huge.  For 20000 identity transformations the
allocated memory was around 2.7 GB.  Is there a reason that asking for level
3 optimization or other compiler switches might cause the memory to grow
like this?

Thanks for any help.

--
View this message in context: 
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Memory-Management-with-Nef-polyhedra-tp3404480p3409822.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.