Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: GIS Worx <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 12:05:08 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Y3N97Mqf95Awc7SOF1dlk0QziN7ZTXp/QUqLyUvt0JqHtesZoEjayYXc828Baahsi+ d5yKMz7n7kgvZ6vvp3WAuK+2WOTZ4qCTGanjW8qfN8Ne6CYmCCDvPBAHXx+q78UppnbU 7W+OCQWBkrGB/PhLu5A2veLbNcNDnHLHZ/jVU=
Thanks for the suggestions Marc,
Increasing the stack size to 20MB from 1MB does not resolve the issue. The lazy kernel seems to have a DAG underlying it. What checks enforce that it is a DAG, i.e. is it possible I've got a long loop in my 'DAG'?
Is there a construction I can use besides Lazy_exact_nt which will side-step this issue? I want to use a Exact_predicates_exact_constructions_kernel, but trying all combinations of using the flag CGAL_DONT_USE_LAZY_KERNEL with CGAL_USE_GMP turned on and off, I run into ambiguous call errors with CGAL::internal::fit_in_double in Orientation_2.h.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Marc Glisse <> wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2011, gisworx wrote:Is a slight increase in the stack size (/STACK) enough to work around this?
With one particular dataset, I'm encountering a stack overflow in lazy
evaluation within the alpha shape constructor.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/tdkhxaks%28v=VS.100%29.aspx
--
Marc Glisse
--
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss
- [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, gisworx, 05/24/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, Marc Glisse, 05/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, Francois Berenger, 05/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 05/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, GIS Worx, 05/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, Marc Glisse, 05/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, GIS Worx, 05/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, Marc Glisse, 05/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 05/26/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 05/31/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, Marc Glisse, 05/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, GIS Worx, 05/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, Marc Glisse, 05/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, Francois Berenger, 05/25/2011
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Stack overflow in Alpha_shape_2, Marc Glisse, 05/25/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.