CGAL users discussion list

[kyewong <>]

Hi, I'm gonna use CGAL::make_surface_mesh to mesh an implicit surface,
extract the isosurface and convert it to Polyhedron_3 using
CGAL::output_surface_facets_to_polyhedron.
I noticed that the algorithm for extracting the isosurface from a given
implicit surface is the paper <Provably good sampling and meshing of
surfaces>.
However, I'm just wondering how about the result and stability of this
algorithm, comparing to the famous marching cube method used by Jules
Bloomenthal ? Is it fit for any type of implicit function?
Thanks!

--
View this message in context: 
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Algorithm-of-CGAL-make-surface-mesh-tp3732231p3732231.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.