Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Switching from inexact constructions kernel to exact constructions kernel?

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Switching from inexact constructions kernel to exact constructions kernel?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Switching from inexact constructions kernel to exact constructions kernel?
  • Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:44:11 +0200

What problems are you encountering?
You can of course use Exact_predicates_exact_constructions
with constrained triangulations but you need to also specify
CGAL::Exact_intersections_tag as Itag

http://www.cgal.org/Manual/beta/doc_html/cgal_manual/Triangulation_2_ref/Class_Constrained_triangulation_2.html


Sebastien.

On 09/22/2011 09:18 AM, Gillian Ng wrote:
I'm thinking of changing my code to use exact constructions because I need to
do constrained Delaunay triangulations quite frequently. Currently I'm using
exact predicates inexact constructions. It would be nice if I could just use
the exact constructions kernel for the triangulation part. I've never really
been sure of how these number types work in CGAL though.

--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Switching-from-inexact-constructions-kernel-to-exact-constructions-kernel-tp3829504p3832606.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page