CGAL users discussion list

[Zohar <>]

You could try to ignore the default libraries, and link with your static
ones instead.

Speaking of static link. Concerning the dll-hell, why do we actually prefer
dynamic link over static?
I mean, why not publish a one big exe, which I know that would work for
sure, and instead I need to bother myself with questions such as does the
'client' installed the right vcredist, maybe there's a collision with
qtcore, etc. and you end up with copying all the dlls you can think of along
with the application, hoping the sxs won't decide to trip you.

--
View this message in context: 
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/cgal4-0-and-static-lib-tp4509164p4509715.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.