Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Mariette Yvinec <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Triangulation_3 and C3t3 questions
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:40:03 +0200
Le 16/07/12 11:29, Zohar a écrit :
1. But there is a face orientation for a tet. Thus for example if this orientation is kept consistently in each tet for the face that consists of the first three vertices of the tet, then one could represent each of the four faces with a specific ccw (or cc) orientation: 021, 032, 013, 123. Meaning if in all the tets the face 021 in each tet (A face which consists of vertices 0,2,1 of the tet) is ccw wrt the tet then the above ordering would result in four ccw faces in each tet. The question is if Triangulation_3 keeps any detail of the vertex ordering in a tet consistent over the triangulation? I would expect the same behavior in Triangulation_2 (the order of the vertices in each triangle should be ccw!) as it holds for a Polyhedron (each face in a poly is ccw). yes the ordering of the tets are consistent. 2. Thanks for the weights explanation. Here my specific problem was the hidden vertices in the c3t3 (or the vertices which belong to other sub-domains than 0, I'm not sure). So treating the c3t3 triangulation as a normal Triangulation_3 on it own is a mistake. One should iterate the cells in the 0 sub-domain and construct from them a new Triangulation_3. Then adding new vertices wouldn't be a problem. I'll publish in a few days a function that construct a Triangulation_3 from the cells of the zero sub-domain in a c3t3, I think the examples in the doc should contain something similar. This would help people understand better the two classes and how to input / output from them.Of course you are right that the meshing process does not control the shape of tets which are in the triangulation but not in the mesh domain. Those tets therefore are skiny. You can't construct a Triangulation_3 form the cells in a mesh subdomain because a the finite cells of a CGAL Triangulation_3 cover the whole convex hull of the vertices -- View this message in context: http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Triangulation-3-and-C3t3-questions-tp4655454p4655463.html Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Mariette Yvinec Geometrica project team INRIA Sophia-Antipolis |
- [cgal-discuss] Triangulation_3 and C3t3 questions, Zohar, 07/14/2012
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Triangulation_3 and C3t3 questions, Mariette Yvinec, 07/16/2012
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Triangulation_3 and C3t3 questions, Zohar, 07/16/2012
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Triangulation_3 and C3t3 questions, Mariette Yvinec, 07/16/2012
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Triangulation_3 and C3t3 questions, Monique Teillaud, 07/16/2012
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Triangulation_3 and C3t3 questions, Zohar, 07/16/2012
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Triangulation_3 and C3t3 questions, Monique Teillaud, 07/16/2012
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Triangulation_3 and C3t3 questions, Zohar, 07/16/2012
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Triangulation_3 and C3t3 questions, Monique Teillaud, 07/16/2012
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Triangulation_3 and C3t3 questions, Mariette Yvinec, 07/16/2012
- [cgal-discuss] Re: Triangulation_3 and C3t3 questions, Zohar, 07/16/2012
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Triangulation_3 and C3t3 questions, Mariette Yvinec, 07/16/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.