Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] Mistake in EdgeProfile documentation (v0v1() and v1v0())

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] Mistake in EdgeProfile documentation (v0v1() and v1v0())


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Mistake in EdgeProfile documentation (v0v1() and v1v0())
  • Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 23:50:49 +0200
  • Organization: GeometryFactory

Thanks Julian, that will be fixed in the next release of CGAL.

Sebastien.

On 10/04/2012 11:38 PM, jpanetta wrote:
The EdgeProfile documentation lists the accessors for collapsing halfedges as
"v0v1()" and "v1v0():"
http://www.cgal.org/Manual/latest/doc_html/cgal_manual/Surface_mesh_simplification_ref/Concept_EdgeProfile.html

However, the Surface_mesh_simplification::Edge_profile<ECM> model actually
implements "v0_v1()" and "v1_v0()."

This mistake was pointed out a few years ago
(http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Progressive-Mesh-td952508.html#a952546
), but since it's buried in that discussion and hasn't been fixed yet, I
thought it worth mentioning again.

Thanks,
Julian



--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Mistake-in-EdgeProfile-documentation-v0v1-and-v1v0-tp4655983.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page