CGAL users discussion list

[mastair <>]

The same problem is present using CGAL::Cartesian<CGAL::Gmpq>.

2013/2/7 Philipp Moeller-2 [via cgal-discuss] <[hidden email]>

mastair <[hidden email]> writes:

> So apparently the problem is with BOOST_PP_REPEAT_FROM_TO(1, 9,
> CGAL_CONSTRUCTION_OPERATOR, _) on line 1381 of lazy.h.

That simply expands to a bunch of overloaded operator(). The new'd
pointer is handed off to a ref-counted class.

>
>
> Any idea?

It's not clear to me if Lazy leaks or the constructor wrapped by
Lazy. It would be a good try to run the program with a non-lazy exact
kernel and see if the checker comes up with the same problem.

--
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/info/cgal-discuss

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Minkowski-sum-3-memory-leak-tp4656672p4656677.html

To unsubscribe from Minkowski_sum_3 memory leak?, click here.
NAML

---

View this message in context: Re: Minkowski_sum_3 memory leak?
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.