CGAL users discussion list

[Philipp Moeller <>]

mastair 
<>
 writes:

> The same problem is present using CGAL::Cartesian<CGAL::Gmpq>.

But the heap checker you are using should be pointing at another place
now, correct? Otherwise I would be a little stumped.

> 2013/2/7 Philipp Moeller-2 [via cgal-discuss] <
> >
>
>> mastair <[hidden 
>> email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4656677&i=0>>
>> writes:
>>
>> > So apparently the problem is with BOOST_PP_REPEAT_FROM_TO(1, 9,
>> > CGAL_CONSTRUCTION_OPERATOR, _) on line 1381 of lazy.h.
>>
>> That simply expands to a bunch of overloaded operator(). The new'd
>> pointer is handed off to a ref-counted class.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Any idea?
>>
>> It's not clear to me if Lazy leaks or the constructor wrapped by
>> Lazy. It would be a good try to run the program with a non-lazy exact
>> kernel and see if the checker comes up with the same problem.