Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: gupta61 <>
- To:
- Subject: [cgal-discuss] Re: A valid Polyhedron_3 surface
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Thanks Laurent.
So if I force the to create the polyhedron with points and their
connectivities such that this property does not hold, I should get an error.
Right?
I am having this issue with one of the surface where the normals are not
consistent but when I am asking if the Polyhedron_3 is valid, I am getting
the answer that yes the normals are valid. Another thing is I tried to
recreate this in a smaller problem (less than 10 facets) but no luck. So is
it ok if I can send you the file with nodal coordinates and connectivities
and if you can check if you are getting the same result? If you have any
preference for the file format, I can dump my data in that particular
format. Let me know.
Piyush
-----
Piyush Gupta
UIUC
--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/A-valid-Polyhedron-3-surface-tp4657983p4657985.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- [cgal-discuss] A valid Polyhedron_3 surface, gupta61, 08/30/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] A valid Polyhedron_3 surface, Laurent Rineau (CGAL/GeometryFactory), 08/30/2013
- [cgal-discuss] Re: A valid Polyhedron_3 surface, gupta61, 08/30/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] A valid Polyhedron_3 surface, Laurent Rineau (CGAL/GeometryFactory), 08/30/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.