Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Ethan <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 13:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
Hi, Glisse,
So you mean bounded_side is for convex_hull_d, not for Delaunay_d, so I'd
better not to call bounded_side function from Delaunay_d object , even
though it's inherited from convex_hull_d ?
Any other alternative that I can use to predicate whether a specific point
is inside/outside/on_boundary of the convex hull of Delaunay_d ?
Regards.
Ethan
--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/confused-by-the-bounded-side-function-of-Delaunay-d-tp4659271p4659273.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Ethan, 05/10/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Marc Glisse, 05/10/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Ethan, 05/10/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Marc Glisse, 05/10/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Ethan, 05/11/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Marc Glisse, 05/10/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Ethan, 05/10/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Marc Glisse, 05/10/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.