Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Marc Glisse <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 23:00:18 +0200 (CEST)
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Ethan wrote:
So you mean bounded_side is for convex_hull_d, not for Delaunay_d, so I'd
better not to call bounded_side function from Delaunay_d object , even
though it's inherited from convex_hull_d ?
Yes. (note that I never used Delaunay_d, I am not a specialist)
Any other alternative that I can use to predicate whether a specific point
is inside/outside/on_boundary of the convex hull of Delaunay_d ?
locate seems like a good starting point. Then you only need to separate inside from on_boundary. Note that contrary to its documentation, Contained_in_simplex_d (from Cartesian_d) returns a bool and not a Bounded_side, so it is probably useless here.
--
Marc Glisse
- [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Ethan, 05/10/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Marc Glisse, 05/10/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Ethan, 05/10/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Marc Glisse, 05/10/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Ethan, 05/11/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Marc Glisse, 05/10/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Ethan, 05/10/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] confused by the bounded_side(...) function of Delaunay_d, Marc Glisse, 05/10/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.