Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
Re: [cgal-discuss] Mesh with criteria containing scalar fields does not work as intended
Chronological Thread
- From: Robin A <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Mesh with criteria containing scalar fields does not work as intended
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
- Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None ; spf=Fail ; spf=None
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:dhQoohHPndNbC8ignbgVap1GYnF86YWxBRYc798ds5kLTJ75pMqwAkXT6L1XgUPTWs2DsrQf27GQ7v6rCT1IyK3CmU5BWaQEbwUCh8QSkl5oK+++Imq/EsTXaTcnFt9JTl5v8iLzG0FUHMHjew+a+SXqvnYsExnyfTB4Ov7yUtaLyZ/njKbvpdaDMk1hv3mUX/BbFF2OtwLft80b08NJC50a7V/3mEZOYPlc3mhyJFiezF7W78a0+4N/oWwL46pyv50IbaKvdKsxSflUDS8tLnsuzMztrxjKCwWVtVUGVWBDqB1CAg6NxVmuRJD7sy28v+xx3CCHMNfeUr0+HzivufQ4ACT0gTsKYmZquFrcjdZ92fpW
Hi Bryn,
thank you for your quick reply.
Unfortunately, i'm not sure if i really understand how to set the
'facetSizingfield'.
Since index_from_surface_patch_index is expecting a pair i suppose that i
have to define the facet_size for every subdomain, that is adjacent to the
subdomains 32 or 33 e.g.:
pair<int,int > p = make_pair(32,9);
facetSizingField.set_size(0.1,2,domain.index_from_surface_patch_index(p));
Would that be correct? Somehow, the size of my facets still does not differ
from the global facet size
Robin
--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Mesh-with-criteria-containing-scalar-fields-does-not-work-as-intended-tp4661090p4661099.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- [cgal-discuss] Mesh with criteria containing scalar fields does not work as intended, Robin A, 08/23/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Mesh with criteria containing scalar fields does not work as intended, Bryn Lloyd, 08/24/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Mesh with criteria containing scalar fields does not work as intended, Robin A, 08/25/2015
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Mesh with criteria containing scalar fields does not work as intended, Bryn Lloyd, 08/24/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.