CGAL users discussion list

[Marc Glisse <>]

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016, s_gandhi wrote:

> Please find the code in the attached file named "Custom_vs_CGAL_speed.cpp".
> Also find the screenshot of timings on my machine, named "cgal_speeds_1.png"
>
> I am using EPIC,
> so should I implement the stuff myself? It gives me better timings.
>
> And if I compare any CGAL's examples with my implementation, I (am) will be
> faster.

You should benchmark against Simple_cartesian<double>, not Epick, since 
you don't seem to aim for exactness.

Please read the link I gave in the previous email and understand that your 
code will sometimes give the wrong result, which is why we cannot use it 
in Epick.

--
Marc Glisse