Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations


Chronological Thread 
  • From: s_gandhi <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations
  • Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:49:34 -0800 (PST)
  • Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None ; spf=SoftFail ; spf=None
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:ZzbjpRDqSX1daf2tcYmKUyQJP3N1i/DPJgcQr6AfoPdwSP7/psbcNUDSrc9gkEXOFd2CrakU1ayH6uuxAyQp2tWojjMrSNR0TRgLiMEbzUQLIfWuLgnFFsPsdDEwB89YVVVorDmROElRH9viNRWJ+iXhpQAbFhi3DwdpPOO9QteU1JTpkbHrsMyJKyxzxxODIppKZC2sqgvQssREyaBDEY0WjiXzn31TZu5NznlpL1/A1zz158O34YIxu38I46FppIZ8VvDxcK08CLBZFz87KHsd5cvxtBCFQxHcyGEbVzANpRVBBQTF7VmuUZ73viv78PF01yCAe8LtZb8xUDWmqaxsTUm72288Kzcl/TSP2YRLh6VBrUf5qg==

I did turn on the optimization, set the level to O3.
In fact, I checked on multiple platforms, on windows as well,
but still I get a time improvement.

I am not that knowledgeable about compiler optimization.
So not sure if function wrappers is the reason.

But it boils down to:
Is using custom codes okay? What about these Editorial Board?
Ideally it should be allowed, it opens the doors to other ways of
implementation, which might prove to be efficient. But this is my
perspective, and would like to know from the people experienced with CGAL

Regards,
S. Gandhi



--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Coding-Conventions-CGAL-methods-VS-custom-implementations-tp4661495p4661500.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page