Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: s_gandhi <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:49:34 -0800 (PST)
- Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None ; spf=SoftFail ; spf=None
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:ZzbjpRDqSX1daf2tcYmKUyQJP3N1i/DPJgcQr6AfoPdwSP7/psbcNUDSrc9gkEXOFd2CrakU1ayH6uuxAyQp2tWojjMrSNR0TRgLiMEbzUQLIfWuLgnFFsPsdDEwB89YVVVorDmROElRH9viNRWJ+iXhpQAbFhi3DwdpPOO9QteU1JTpkbHrsMyJKyxzxxODIppKZC2sqgvQssREyaBDEY0WjiXzn31TZu5NznlpL1/A1zz158O34YIxu38I46FppIZ8VvDxcK08CLBZFz87KHsd5cvxtBCFQxHcyGEbVzANpRVBBQTF7VmuUZ73viv78PF01yCAe8LtZb8xUDWmqaxsTUm72288Kzcl/TSP2YRLh6VBrUf5qg==
I did turn on the optimization, set the level to O3.
In fact, I checked on multiple platforms, on windows as well,
but still I get a time improvement.
I am not that knowledgeable about compiler optimization.
So not sure if function wrappers is the reason.
But it boils down to:
Is using custom codes okay? What about these Editorial Board?
Ideally it should be allowed, it opens the doors to other ways of
implementation, which might prove to be efficient. But this is my
perspective, and would like to know from the people experienced with CGAL
Regards,
S. Gandhi
--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Coding-Conventions-CGAL-methods-VS-custom-implementations-tp4661495p4661500.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations, s_gandhi, 01/15/2016
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations, Marc Glisse, 01/15/2016
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations, s_gandhi, 01/15/2016
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations, Marc Glisse, 01/15/2016
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations, s_gandhi, 01/18/2016
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations, Marc Glisse, 01/18/2016
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations, Sagar Gandhi, 01/19/2016
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations, Marc Glisse, 01/18/2016
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations, s_gandhi, 01/18/2016
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations, Marc Glisse, 01/15/2016
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations, s_gandhi, 01/15/2016
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Coding Conventions - CGAL methods VS custom implementations, Marc Glisse, 01/15/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.