Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: "Laurent Rineau (CGAL/GeometryFactory)" <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] make_mesh_3 results in non-manifold edges in surface mesh
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:34:38 +0100
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None ; spf=Pass ; spf=None
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:JkNFpRfC1W3SXvxXVxvKcVn8lGMj4u6mDksu8pMizoh2WeGdxc66YR7h7PlgxGXEQZ/co6odzbGH7+a7ASdasd7B6ClEK8McEUddyI0/pE8JPo2sMQXDNvnkbig3ToxpdWRO2DWFC3VTA9v0fFbIo3e/vnY4ExT7MhdpdKyuQtaBx5f/6+fn8JLaZ0BEhSG2fKhpBBSwtwTY8McM0qV4LaNkgD/Av2FFffge/2JuKFuO11bXye6Uu7Fu9CFdp+gw2cdLTaLgbuVyBehcBSk8PmYpotfqsxTKUCOE6XIYFGIMnUwbUED+8BjmU8Kp4WPBve1n1XzCMA==
- Organization: GeometryFactory
Le Wednesday, January 11, 2017 2:20:02 PM CET aleph a ?crit :
> Dear all,
>
> I observed that: lloyd() and odt() introduces non-manifold edges, however
> perturb() and exude() worked fine for me when CGAL::MANIFOLD is used.
That's true. Both Lloyd and ODT optimiser are global optimizers, that do not
check the topology of the resulting surface.
> I notice also that the mesher tend to have issues with intel TBB when
> CGAL::MANIFOLD is used.
Indeed. That is a known issue, and the main reason we have not yet
officialized the MANIFOLD option.
--
Laurent Rineau, PhD
R&D Engineer at GeometryFactory http://www.geometryfactory.com/
Release Manager of the CGAL Project http://www.cgal.org/
- Re: [cgal-discuss] make_mesh_3 results in non-manifold edges in surface mesh, aleph, 01/11/2017
- Re: [cgal-discuss] make_mesh_3 results in non-manifold edges in surface mesh, Laurent Rineau (CGAL/GeometryFactory), 01/12/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.