CGAL users discussion list

["Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)" <>]

On 08/08/2017 01:41 PM, 

 wrote:
> I plan to use corefinement and indeed will have consecutive operations. I am
> computing the normals first in order to repair my input meshes. They are
> generated from a CAD model and are riddled with errors and so I was planning
> on pulling out the vertex positions and normals and rebuilding the mesh from
> scratch using poisson reconstruction. Do you have another recommendation?

It depends which kind of defects you have. If you send me the mesh (in a 
private message) I can have a look and let you know what you can do
with CGAL.

> I am also not very familiar with nef_polyhedron boolean operations, are they
> generally preferred to corefinement?

To simplify what written in the user manual, you can use corefinement
if you know that the output will be a manifold surface.

> My apologies I should have mentioned I am using CGAL 4.7 on ubuntu 16.04
> with gcc 5.4.0

I think the error was fixed in 4.8

Sebastien.

> Thanks,
> Jack
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Compiler-error-no-matching-function-for-call-to-sqrt-tp4662890p4662892.html
> Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.