Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Joachim Pouderoux <>
- To:
- Subject: [cgal-discuss] Corefinement and Boolean Operations and original face index
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:12:39 -0400
- Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None ; spf=Pass ; spf=None
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:zEzHLRLkadhS43Ch69mcpTZWNBhigK39O0sv0rFitYgXLfjxwZ3uMQTl6Ol3ixeRBMOAtKIC1rKempujcFJDyK7JiGoFfp1IWk1NouQttCtkPvS4D1bmJuXhdS0wEZcKflZk+3amLRodQ56mNBWB6kG1uDUdExG6OQtuLfnuAabTid623qa84c79eQJN0Ri6aLhyLRD+lQLMusQMhpZyYvIzzRLConpNPfxR2G9lP1WOjz7/59uv9YRutS9XvqRypIZ7TazmcvFgHvRjBzM8PjVt6Q==
Hello,
I am trying to evaluate the new CGAL feature that allows to efficiently intersect two polygonalIn my context, it is important to be able to track down from which initial input mesh face
a face in the triangulated mesh output comes from. It looks like this is where the named property
called "face_patch_map" could have been useful. However, if I am correct, this feature is not
supported by the algorithm. Am I wrong?
Is there another (topological) way I could reconstruct those face ids?
Thanks for your help,
Best,
Joachim
Joachim Pouderoux, PhD
Technical Expert - Scientific Computing Team
Kitware SAS
- [cgal-discuss] Corefinement and Boolean Operations and original face index, Joachim Pouderoux, 12/04/2017
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Corefinement and Boolean Operations and original face index, Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 12/04/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.