Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] set_error_handler etc. in header-only mode

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] set_error_handler etc. in header-only mode


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Fritz Mueller <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] set_error_handler etc. in header-only mode
  • Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2019 01:50:10 -0800
  • Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None ; spf=Pass ; spf=None
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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

Hi Marc,

> If you want to make sure we don't forget to fix it, you can open an issue
> in cgal's github with this information (or even better open a pull request
> with a fix), although hopefully it will get fixed soon even without that.

I opened issue #4400 with an attached repro, and also put up PR #4401.

I just moved the handler/behaviour accessors outside the anonymous namespace
in that PR for minimal impact, but sounds like maybe the anonymous namespace
there should be gotten rid of entirely?

cheers,
--FritzM.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page