coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Christine Paulin-Mohring <Christine.Paulin-Mohring AT inria.fr>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr, scagnett AT dimi.uniud.it
- Subject: Re: Strange non-wellformed error with Coinductive types
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 23:00:17 +0100 (MET)
Dear Ivan and Marino,
In order to check the well-formednes of fixpoint definition, Coq
expands names but only transparent names. The so-called opaque names
are considered as abstract proofs, there is no need to keep the
underlying proof object. The default in Coq is that a theorem or
lemma is opaque while a definition is transparent. But an opaque
constant can be made transparent using the command
Transparent WEIRD. A better solution is to replace the keywords
Lemma / Qed. in the WEIRD definition by
Definition / Defined.
Best regards,
Christine Paulin.
- Strange non-wellformed error with Coinductive types, Ivan Scagnetto
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Strange non-wellformed error with Coinductive types, Christine Paulin-Mohring
- Re: Strange non-wellformed error with Coinductive types, Ivan Scagnetto
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.