Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Opaque in the library

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Opaque in the library


chronological Thread 
  • From: "Eduardo Gimenez" <Eduardo.Gimenez AT trusted-logic.fr>
  • To: "Nadeem Abdul Hamid" <nadeem AT acm.org>
  • Cc: <coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Opaque in the library
  • Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:26:34 +0100
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>

> Coq doesn't really throw away proof terms even for opaque lemmas, does
> it? I don't see any difference in size of the .vo files at all whether
> "Save" or "Defined" is used.

When you develop a proof of T that uses the lemma L, you may either place
just the name L of the
lemma, or directly insert in T the proof of it. This latter case arrives
when you simplify your goal and
MyLemma is not an opaque constant. If you insert the proof of L, the size of
T may be considerably
increased.

Cheers,
Eduardo Gimenez.






Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page