coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: "Eduardo Gimenez" <Eduardo.Gimenez AT trusted-logic.fr>
- To: "Nadeem Abdul Hamid" <nadeem AT acm.org>
- Cc: <coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Opaque in the library
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:26:34 +0100
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
> Coq doesn't really throw away proof terms even for opaque lemmas, does
> it? I don't see any difference in size of the .vo files at all whether
> "Save" or "Defined" is used.
When you develop a proof of T that uses the lemma L, you may either place
just the name L of the
lemma, or directly insert in T the proof of it. This latter case arrives
when you simplify your goal and
MyLemma is not an opaque constant. If you insert the proof of L, the size of
T may be considerably
increased.
Cheers,
Eduardo Gimenez.
- Re: [Coq-Club] Opaque in the library, Nadeem Abdul Hamid
- Re: [Coq-Club] Opaque in the library, Eduardo Gimenez
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.