coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: dachuan.yu AT yale.edu
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Cc: dachuan.yu AT yale.edu
- Subject: [Coq-Club] NewInduction... Cannot solve a second-order unification problem.
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:08:54 -0400
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Hi,
I was using coq 7.3.1.
I have something like this:
precond : nat -> Type.
g : (precond O).
H2: (G_Weaken g (baseG O a1 g1)).
where G_Weaken is some relation defined between (precond O).
When I tried to do induction on g, it says "Cannot solve a second-
order unification problem". Is this something fundamentally not
doable, or could I get around this somehow? Doing inversion on H2 does
not help because that way I don't get an induction hypothesis. Doing
induction on H2 is not what I want because I need the fact that the
second argument of G_Weaken is (baseG ...).
Thanks in advance!
Dachuan
- [Coq-Club] NewInduction... Cannot solve a second-order unification problem., dachuan . yu
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.