coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Adam Koprowski <koper AT astercity.net>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Bug in Coq.
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 20:10:48 +0200
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
During my work with Coq I quite often encounter message in style of: "Anomaly: something. Please report" (very often while working with setoids or induction schemas created with Schema command). It's a substantial work to report all those errors thus my question: is it really worth doing? I mean is there any chance it is going to help with development of stable Coq version?
Another question. With definitions like:
> Ltac test1 x := intro x.
> Ltac test2 x := intros until x.
and lemma like:
> Theorem everything: forall M, M.
-) why 'test2 M' fails (No hypothesis x in current goal even after head-reduction) while 'intros until M' works fine and 'test1 M' introduces hypothesis with name 'M' as expected? This problem was not present in Coq 7.4 as far as I know.
Kind regards,
Adam Koprowski
--
----------------------------------------------------
-
akoprow AT cs.vu.nl,
ICQ: 3204612 -
- The difference between impossible and possible -
- lies in determination (Tommy Lasorda) -
----------------------------------------------------
- [Coq-Club] Bug in Coq., Adam Koprowski
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.