coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Roland Zumkeller <Roland.Zumkeller AT polytechnique.fr>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Re: Inductives in Modules
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 18:05:10 +0200
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Here is the response of Jacek Chrzaszcz (it didn't go to the list).
Le 13 mai 04, à 17:10, Jacek Chrzaszcz a écrit :
This is a known deficiency od the implementation of modules in
Coq. This is purely a technical problem, but a painful one.
We hope to solve this problem in the future... but it requires heavy
modifications in many places of the Coq sources....
Jacek
Le 24 mai 04, à 17:37, Frederic Blanqui a écrit :
i encountered the same problem too. i think that inductives are not seen as
other definitions. could this be changed in a future version of coq?
--------------- previous message ------------------
Roland Zumkeller
Roland.Zumkeller AT polytechnique.fr
Thu, 13 May 2004 16:27:09 +0200
I'd like to use modules to do model first-order signatures and algebras
on them :
Module Type Signature.
Variable V : Set.
Variable F : nat -> Set.
End Signature.
When defining the following module
Module S : Signature.
Inductive V : Set:= X | Y.
Inductive F : nat -> Set:= Plus : F 2 | Zero : F 0 | One : F 0.
End S.
I get this error message:
"User error: Signature components for label V do not match"
However when defining the inductive with another name first, everything
works fine.
Module S1 : Signature.
Inductive V_ : Set:= X | Y.
Definition V := V_.
Inductive F_ : nat -> Set:= Plus : F_ 2 | Zero : F_ 0 | One : F_ 0.
Definition F := F_.
End S1.
Is this a bug or is there a deeper reason for this ?
- [Coq-Club] Re: Inductives in Modules, Frederic Blanqui
- Re: [Coq-Club] Re: Inductives in Modules, Roland Zumkeller
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.