Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - [Coq-Club] Evaluation and comparisons on the natural numbers

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

[Coq-Club] Evaluation and comparisons on the natural numbers


chronological Thread 
  • From: Brian Emre Aydemir <baydemir AT cis.upenn.edu>
  • To: Coq Club <coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr>
  • Subject: [Coq-Club] Evaluation and comparisons on the natural numbers
  • Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 21:02:28 -0400
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>

Hi,

So if n and m have type nat, I'd like to be able to write something like

  if (n < m) then X else Y

and be able to reduce/simplify that down to either X or Y somehow. However, what I wrote doesn't work since (n < m) has type Prop. So instead, I could write (lt_ge_dec n m).

Then my question is: how do I simplify (if (lt_ge_dec n m) then X else Y) down to X or Y? For example, I'm guessing I need to do a case analysis on (n < m \/ n >= m), but how do I prove that assertion. And then once I'm assuming one of the cases, say (n < m), how do I proceed to simplify the expression? Perhaps lt_ge_dec is not the way to go, but then I haven't been able to find anything else that works. As a related question: are there any comparison functions on the natural numbers with the type (nat -> nat -> bool)? Or maybe I should try working with the integers instead?

Thanks,
Brian

--
Brian Emre Aydemir
http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~baydemir/





Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page