Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - [Coq-Club] Implicit arguments

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

[Coq-Club] Implicit arguments


chronological Thread 
  • From: Rene Vestergaard <vester AT jaist.ac.jp>
  • To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
  • Subject: [Coq-Club] Implicit arguments
  • Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:12:18 +0100
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
  • Organization: JAIST

Please find below an example development of deskolemisation. When invoking it, the specific P needs to be listed in addition to the formula being deskolemised. Is there a nice/standard alternative whose uses are implicit about the P?

Cheers,
/R

Section Deskolemise.

Variable A : Type.
Variable B : Type.
Variable P : A -> B -> Prop.

Theorem deskolemise : (exists F : A -> B, forall a : A , P a (F a))
                      -> forall a : A , exists b : B , P a b.
intro skolemised. elim skolemised.
intros F gConcl arg. exists (F arg). apply gConcl.
Qed.

End Deskolemise.





Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page