coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Yevgeniy Makarov <emakarov AT cs.indiana.edu>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Manipulating proof terms
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:36:33 -0500
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
- Organization: Indiana University
Hello,
I am interested in using Coq for program extraction from classical
proofs. Coq seems suitable for this because it produces nice proof
terms, which are almost programs. So I hope to prove theorems in Coq,
take proof terms and use them by my own programs to replace the
classical rule NNPP by call/cc, eliminate computationally irrelevant
information, normalize, and so on (currently I have a normalizer
written in Scheme). It is quite possible to parse proof terms that are
displayed by Print command, but I am wondering if there is a still
easier way, namely, if I can get an access to the proof term's inner
representation.
Thank you,
Yevgeniy
- [Coq-Club] Manipulating proof terms, Yevgeniy Makarov
- Re: [Coq-Club] Manipulating proof terms, Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: [Coq-Club] Manipulating proof terms,
Stefan Karrmann
- Re: [Coq-Club] Manipulating proof terms, Yevgeniy Makarov
- Re: [Coq-Club] Manipulating proof terms, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
- Re: [Coq-Club] Manipulating proof terms,
Hugo Herbelin
- Re: [Coq-Club] Manipulating proof terms, Pierre Letouzey
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.