Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] beginners problem with well_foundness.

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] beginners problem with well_foundness.


chronological Thread 
  • From: Thery Laurent <thery AT ns.di.univaq.it>
  • To: Adam Koprowski <adam.koprowski AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] beginners problem with well_foundness.
  • Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 17:23:08 +0200 (CEST)
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>


 Now he's able to prove:

SomeConditions -> forall s: seqInf, False.



Is he able to prove

 SomeConditions -> forall s: nat -> A, {n: nat | ~(R (s n) (s (n+1))}

?

--
Laurent





Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page