coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] beginners problem with well_foundness.

From: Karol Oslowski <ko181282 AT zodiac.mimuw.edu.pl>
To: Thery Laurent <thery AT ns.di.univaq.it>
Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] beginners problem with well_foundness.
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:21:50 +0200
List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>

Thery Laurent wrote:

Now he's able to prove:

SomeConditions -> forall s: seqInf, False.

Is he able to prove

SomeConditions -> forall s: nat -> A, {n: nat | ~(R (s n) (s (n+1))}

Yes I am able to proove it. How does it help ?

kind regards

Karol Oslowski

[Coq-Club] beginners problem with well_foundness., Adam Koprowski
- Re: [Coq-Club] beginners problem with well_foundness., Thery Laurent
  - Re: [Coq-Club] beginners problem with well_foundness., Karol Oslowski