coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Pierre Casteran <pierre.casteran AT labri.fr>
- To: Pierre Casteran <pierre.casteran AT labri.fr>
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Principle of definition
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:38:36 +0200
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
More generally, is the following set of declaration consistent with
CIC + Classical ?
Parameter the : forall (A:Set)(P:A->Prop)
(E : exists a, P a)(U : forall a b, P a -> P b -> a = b) , A.
Axiom the_ok : forall A P E U, P (the A P E U).
Axiom the_eq : forall (A:Set) (P:A->Prop) E U a, P a -> a = the A P E U.
Pierre
--
Pierre Casteran
http://www.labri.fr/Perso/~casteran/
(+33) 540006931
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
- [Coq-Club] Principle of definition, Pierre Casteran
- Re: [Coq-Club] Principle of definition, Pierre Casteran
- Re: [Coq-Club] Principle of definition, Hugo Herbelin
- Re: [Coq-Club] Principle of definition, Pierre Casteran
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.