coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Stefan Monnier <monnier AT iro.umontreal.ca>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club]Formal presentation of Elim as match+fix?
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:10:04 -0400
- Cancel-lock: sha1:in8TPnPMadVC7FBm2LRTaSjI0Vk=
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
All the papers I could find about inductive constructions seem to present
the elimination scheme as an integrated induction operator "Elim".
In Coq, on the other hand, I can use "Fixpoint" and "match" as two separate
constructs, to write my inductions mush as I would do in ML.
Could someone point me to a paper presenting formally the constraints placed
on the use of "match" and "Fixpoint" to guarantee termination (in Coq or in
some simplified variant)? Ideally, this paper would come with a proof of
strong normalization (maybe via reducibility to the usual Elim form).
Stefan
- [Coq-Club]Formal presentation of Elim as match+fix?, Stefan Monnier
- Re: [Coq-Club]Formal presentation of Elim as match+fix?, Frederic Blanqui
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.