coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Frederic Blanqui <blanqui AT loria.fr>
- To: Stefan Monnier <monnier AT iro.umontreal.ca>
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club]Formal presentation of Elim as match+fix?
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:22:40 +0200 (CEST)
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Could someone point me to a paper presenting formally the constraints placed on the use of "match" and "Fixpoint" to guarantee termination (in Coq or in some simplified variant)? Ideally, this paper would come with a proof of strong normalization (maybe via reducibility to the usual Elim form).
the constraints are the same as with the elim construction: recursive calls must be done on arguments structurally smaller. for a study of coq with fixpoints, you should look at philippe audebaud's papers. note that there are more powerful termination criteria allowing non structurally smaller arguments.
- [Coq-Club]Formal presentation of Elim as match+fix?, Stefan Monnier
- Re: [Coq-Club]Formal presentation of Elim as match+fix?, Frederic Blanqui
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.