coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Noam Zeilberger <noam+coq AT cs.cmu.edu>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] dealing with mutually-inductive definitions
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:43:29 -0400
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
This was supposed to go out before the previous mesage, but I
accidentally sent it with the wrong (non-list-member) address.
Anyways, thanks to Adam, Xavier, and Matthieu for their helpful
responses! I might post another question about parameterized
mutually-inductive definitions soon...but I have to formulate
the question first.
Noam
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:01:57PM -0400, Noam Zeilberger wrote:
> I was wondering if there is some sort of tutorial/FAQ for working with
> mutually-(co)inductive definitions in Coq? I'm looking for something
> more than just the documentation of the Scheme command. For example,
> what is the most natural way of taking an ordinary mathematical proof
> of a list of theorems by simultaneous induction, and encoding it in
> the tactic language? Has anyone done any significant amount of
> theorem-proving using mutually-inductive definitions with more than
> (say) three branches?
>
> Noam
- [Coq-Club] dealing with mutually-inductive definitions, Noam Zeilberger
- Re: [Coq-Club] dealing with mutually-inductive definitions, Noam Zeilberger
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Coq-Club] dealing with mutually-inductive definitions,
Noam Zeilberger
- Re: [Coq-Club] dealing with mutually-inductive definitions, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] dealing with mutually-inductive definitions, Xavier Leroy
- Re: [Coq-Club] dealing with mutually-inductive definitions, Matthieu . Sozeau
- Re: [Coq-Club] dealing with mutually-inductive definitions, Matthieu . Sozeau
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.