coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: roconnor AT theorem.ca
- To: Ethan Aubin <ethan.aubin AT gmail.com>
- Cc: Coq Club <coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] rose tree equality
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:35:52 -0400 (EDT)
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Yves Bertot wrote:
Now, Pierre's proposal to use a pair of mutually inductive types is viable alternative.
Although it is easier to use, the disadvantage if the mutally inductive types proposal is that you have to rewrite all the theory about lists again for list_rose. It is much better to go through the effort of writing a new inductive principle and reusing the list library.
--
Russell O'Connor <http://r6.ca/>
``All talk about `theft,''' the general counsel of the American Graphophone
Company wrote, ``is the merest claptrap, for there exists no property in
ideas musical, literary or artistic, except as defined by statute.''
- [Coq-Club] rose tree equality, Ethan Aubin
- Re: [Coq-Club] rose tree equality,
Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] rose tree equality,
Yves Bertot
- Re: [Coq-Club] rose tree equality, roconnor
- Re: [Coq-Club] rose tree equality,
Yves Bertot
- Re: [Coq-Club] rose tree equality,
Pierre Courtieu
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.