coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Marko Malikovi� <marko AT ffri.hr>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] I need advice
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:57:46 +0100 (CET)
- Importance: Normal
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Dear all,
I need advice from somebody with experience and who have some feeling what
the best direction in this situation is:
- tfrom proof of one goal I have lot of subgoals
- some of the subgoal is possible to prove but some of them is not
- proved subgoals are not interesting for me but in unproved subgoals I
have some computed hypotheses which are important for me and with this
hypothesis I have to recursively reasoning in further steps. Furthermore,
some hypotheses are missing after first step.
I have several solutions:
- to build ltac-s and recursive reasoning (here I have problem that many
hypotheses are introduced in the middle of the proof (using intro) and
because matching patterns do not accept this hypotheses - there are not
declared before)
- to try to build-up the same context in every subgoal like it was in the
beginning
- to record somewhere important hypotheses from the subgoals and then to
try to use them
I know, my question is very general but what is your experience - in what
direction I have to go?
Thank you very much,
Marko Malikoviæ
- [Coq-Club] I need advice, Marko Malikoviæ
- Re: [Coq-Club] I need advice, Sean Wilson
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.