coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Yves Bertot <Yves.Bertot AT sophia.inria.fr>
- To: marko AT ffri.hr
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] How to compare hypotheses over subgoals
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:49:45 +0100
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
marko AT ffri.hr
wrote:
The question is: "How can I compare hypotheses H in different subgoals andI don't believe you can. The idea behind tactics is rather that you address each goal independently
if in each subgoals the hypotheses H are the same then apply some tactic?"
Any idea?
from the others...
Can you turn your problem around so that all cases appear in the same goal?
As a side note, the example you give is very strange. Do you believe that
by assuming
H: lista_predikata = predikat a1 b2 a3 c4 :: predikat d1 c2 a3 c4::nil
you are actually asserting that predikat a1 b2 a3 c4 hold? This is not the case!
Nobody prevents you from defining a list of propositions, even if no element in the proposition
hold, as in the following script:
Require Import List.
Definition l := False::nil.
Definition counter_example : l = False::nil := refl_equal l.
In this three line script, we never provide a proof of False.
Yves
- [Coq-Club] How to compare hypotheses over subgoals, marko
- Re: [Coq-Club] How to compare hypotheses over subgoals, Yves Bertot
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.