Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Re: allowing non-structurally terminating functions ?

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Re: allowing non-structurally terminating functions ?


chronological Thread 
  • From: Julien Forest <forest AT ensiie.fr>
  • To: Arnaud Spiwack <Arnaud.Spiwack AT lix.polytechnique.fr>
  • Cc: Matthieu Sozeau <sozeau AT lri.fr>, frederic.blanqui AT loria.fr, coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Re: allowing non-structurally terminating functions ?
  • Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:17:26 +0200
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :organization:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=RljIXmKE9Zzqli3QV4ku9wvAFCCiQRv3irBw7mnp/cIrHS4HFB+oE/mVCVrgOCSAyc aZNY1gRw+09cCcEFJC64+u1dZZEVRvONz3mmezQiV5N4HKmBTxlk9EGZYWvzHHuJI95h zhkW9pxHugeTYcpsRxPPXdNizC5AhAOnaqOuA=
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
  • Organization: CNAM

> I personnally have no problem with an Unsafe Fixpoint feature. It's 
> nothing worse than using "Axiom" anyway (plus it doesn't block 
> reduction, so it's even better). As long as when I Print an Unsafe 
> Fixpoint, I can see it is such (and more generally, that it's an 
> accessible information to the kernel).
The only difference between Axiom and Usafe Fixpoint is that any one is
(should be) aware that using Axiom is dangerous w.r.t. consistency. 
J





Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page