coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: "M. Scott Doerrie" <mdoerri AT cs.jhu.edu>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Leveraging the module system
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:15:38 -0500
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
I have defined a ModuleType functor and a Module functor somewhat as follows.
For discussion assume SIG2 is a Module Type.
Module Type SIG (P: SIG2).
Parameter foo : P.t -> Prop.
End SIG.
Module Impl (P:SIG2).
Definition foo (P:t) : Prop := (* implementation *).
End Impl
I can't determine how to declare that Impl is of type SIG? Use of <: and : operators produce syntactic error messages. I'm sure this is a simple example, but I am confused by what I thought was straightforward to express.
Scott Doerrie
- [Coq-Club] Leveraging the module system, M. Scott Doerrie
- Re: [Coq-Club] Leveraging the module system,
Taral
- Re: [Coq-Club] Leveraging the module system, M. Scott Doerrie
- Re: [Coq-Club] Leveraging the module system,
Elie Soubiran
- Re: [Coq-Club] Leveraging the module system, M. Scott Doerrie
- Re: [Coq-Club] Leveraging the module system, M. Scott Doerrie
- Re: [Coq-Club] Leveraging the module system,
Taral
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.