coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT hcoop.net>
- To: Edsko de Vries <devriese AT cs.tcd.ie>
- Cc: coq-club <coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Dependent rewrite question (probably simple answer! :)
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:14:54 -0500
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Edsko de Vries wrote:
That was great! Thanks a million. Using chapter 9 from your book I could now finish the proof. For posteriority's sake, the completed script is below. By the way, are these axioms about equality implementable? Or does extraction become impossible when one of these axioms is used?
I'm guessing you mean the [Eqdep] and [JMeq] axioms. These are in [Prop], so it doesn't make sense to talk about "implementing them for extraction," since any Coq realization would be erased, anyway. Programs that use them extract to working OCaml code.
- [Coq-Club] Dependent rewrite question (probably simple answer! :), Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] Dependent rewrite question (probably simple answer! :),
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Dependent rewrite question (probably simple answer! :),
Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] Dependent rewrite question (probably simple answer! :),
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Dependent rewrite question (probably simple answer! :),
Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] Dependent rewrite question (probably simple answer! :), Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Dependent rewrite question (probably simple answer! :),
Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] Dependent rewrite question (probably simple answer! :),
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Dependent rewrite question (probably simple answer! :),
Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] Dependent rewrite question (probably simple answer! :),
Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.